Edited by Peter Cane, Herwig C H Hofmann, Eric C Ip, and Peter L Lindseth
Oxford University Press
Published in December 2020
1,168 pp.
Abstract: The
comparative study of administrative law has a long history dating back more
than 200 years. It has enjoyed a renaissance in the past 15 years or so and now
sits alongside fields such as comparative constitutional law and global
administrative law as a well-established area of scholarly research. This book
is the first to provide a broad and systematic view of the subject both in
terms of the topics covered and the legal traditions surveyed. In its various
parts it surveys the historical beginnings of comparative administrative law
scholarship, discusses important methodological issues, examines the
relationship between administrative law and regime type, analyses basic
concepts such as 'administrative power' and 'accountability', and deals with
the creation, functions, and control of administrative power, and values of
administration. The final part looks to the future of this young
sub-discipline.
In this volume, distinguished experts and leaders in the field discuss a wide range of issues in administrative law from a comparative perspective. Administrative law is concerned with the conferral, nature, exercise, and legal control of administrative (or 'executive') governmental power. It has close links with other areas of 'public law', notably constitutional law and international law. It is of great interest and importance not only to lawyers but also to students of politics, government, and public policy. Studying public law comparatively helps to identify both similarities and differences between the way government power and its control is managed in different countries and legal traditions.
In this volume, distinguished experts and leaders in the field discuss a wide range of issues in administrative law from a comparative perspective. Administrative law is concerned with the conferral, nature, exercise, and legal control of administrative (or 'executive') governmental power. It has close links with other areas of 'public law', notably constitutional law and international law. It is of great interest and importance not only to lawyers but also to students of politics, government, and public policy. Studying public law comparatively helps to identify both similarities and differences between the way government power and its control is managed in different countries and legal traditions.
HKU Law colleagues contributed to three chapters of this important work co-edited by Eric Ip: Ch 4 "A Chinese Tradition" by Albert Chen, Ch 14 "Parliamentary Regimes" by Eric Ip, and Ch 17 "Authoritarian Regimes" by Po Jen Yap.
No comments:
Post a Comment