Showing posts with label Sida Liu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sida Liu. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Sida Liu joined the Asian Law and Society Association (ALSA) as President

Congratulations to Professor Sida Liu, who has joined the Asian Law and Society Association (ALSA) as President.

ALSA is an international association of socio-legal scholars with an Asian perspective on law and society research. ALSA was officially established at the East Asian Law and Society Conference 2015, held at Waseda University, Japan, from August 4–7, 2015.

Since then, ALSA’s membership has grown steadily, including members based in more than 30 countries and regions. These include Australia, Belgium, Canada, China (Mainland), Germany, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Nepal, the Netherlands, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, the United States, Vietnam, and others. The executive office is currently housed at Waseda University, Japan.

ALSA aims to foster scholarship on law and society in Asia and to engage the broader global research community. It stands at an opportune moment to help develop Asian law and society research into a vibrant and cohesive research field. Its annual meetings provide a platform to define the field, advance theory, and cultivate empirical work and new scholarship.

Please click here for more details about ALSA.
The list of ALSA people is available here.

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Sida Liu on Professions and Capitalism (New Book Chapter)

"Professions and capitalism"
Sida Liu
in Tracey L. Adams (ed), Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Professions (Edward Elgar Publishing, December 2025), Chapter 3, pp. 35 - 47
Published online: December 2025

Abstract: This chapter investigates the historical and contemporary interplay between the evolution of professions and the transformation of capitalism. Although not all professions originate from capitalism, the social structures and cultural practices of modern professions have been significantly influenced by capitalist imperatives. Historically autonomous professions, such as law and medicine, have evolved to support corporate organizations and industrial systems. As capitalism advances, professions have taken on increasingly important roles, fulfilling three pivotal functions. First, they provide the expertise essential for the functioning of capitalist institutions. Second, they legitimize capitalism by generating and disseminating academic knowledge and specialized practices throughout society. Third, professions nurture seeds of resistance to capitalism by fostering practitioners who advocate for alternative ideologies and institutions. Consequently, the relationship between professions and capitalism is symbiotic and mutually constitutive: capitalism underpins the institutions and ethics of professions, which in turn facilitate the operation and perpetuation of capitalist economies.

Wednesday, December 17, 2025

HKU–ALSA Young Scholars Conference Successfully Held at the University of Hong Kong

The HKU–ALSA Young Scholars Conference was successfully held at the University of Hong Kong from December 5 to 6, 2025. The two-day conference brought together early-career scholars and senior academics from diverse jurisdictions to engage in in-depth discussions on emerging frontiers in legal research. As the second installment of the ALSA Young Scholars Conference series, following its inaugural meeting at Singapore Management University in 2024, the conference reaffirmed the series’ longstanding commitment to supporting and advancing early-career scholarship.


At the core of the conference were presentations by twelve early-career scholars, whose papers were rigorously selected by the organizing committee from more than 130 submissions spanning five continents. The participating scholars represented leading institutions, including Tsinghua University, the University of Hong Kong, the University of Macau, the National University of Singapore, the University of Cambridge, and the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná in Brazil. Their research addressed a wide range of jurisdictions, including China, the United States, Europe, Southeast Asia, and South America. The organizing committee comprised Dr. Zhicheng Huang, Global Academic Fellow at the Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong; Professor Akshaya Kamalnath of the Australian National University; and Professor Amnart Tangkiriphimarn of Thammasat University.

The conference opened with welcoming remarks by Professor Fu Hualing, Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Hong Kong, and Professor Tan Cheng Han, President of the Asian Law Schools Association and Professor at the National University of Singapore. This was followed by a leadership roundtable on Asian Legal Education, which brought together four law school deans, including Dean Fu Hualing; Professor Tan Cheng Han, former Dean of the law schools at the National University of Singapore and City University of Hong Kong; and Professor Sida Liu, Associate Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Hong Kong. The roundtable explored how Asian law schools can balance localization and internationalization, and how legal education should respond proactively to the challenges posed by artificial intelligence to both the legal profession and curriculum design.


Over the course of the conference, four thematic sessions focused on Empirical Legal Studies, AI and Law, Commercial Law, and Data and Information. Each session provided a supportive and intellectually rigorous setting for sustained exchange between early-career scholars and senior academics. The twelve presenters engaged in close and dynamic dialogue with their discussants, benefiting from detailed and constructive feedback on their research.

In the Commercial Law session, Dr. Guo Shuai, Associate Professor at China University of Political Science and Law, introduced his original comparative law concept of Interadaptationism and, building on this framework, examined the role of the Global South in reshaping the future of bankruptcy law. He noted that the conference was thoughtfully designed and particularly effective in fostering a scholarly community that encouraged deep engagement among early-career researchers from diverse disciplinary backgrounds.


Professor Cheng Jin-Hua of Shanghai Jiao Tong University served as a discussant in the Data and Information session, where he commended the overall quality of the selected papers and expressed his hope for closer collaboration between universities in mainland China and Hong Kong in the training of young scholars. Professor Wang Jiangyu of City University of Hong Kong acted as a discussant in the AI and Law session, emphasizing that mentoring early-career scholars is a core responsibility of senior academics and highlighting the unique value of young scholars conferences as platforms for sustained academic support.

In addition to the thematic sessions, three keynote addresses collectively outlined a clear pathway for scholarly development. Professor Benjamin Chen of the University of Hong Kong spoke on interdisciplinary research, illustrating how law and economics and empirical methods can be mobilized to address complex legal problems. Professor Wang Jiangyu, drawing on his experience as editor-in-chief of two leading academic journals, offered guidance from an editor’s perspective and underscored the importance of clearly articulating a paper’s original scholarly contribution. Professor Douglas Arner of the University of Hong Kong focused on impactful legal research, arguing that impact should be understood not merely as an ex post assessment, but as an ex ante research orientation that guides scholars in framing research questions and selecting materials.


In the closing remarks, the organizing team expressed its sincere appreciation to all speakers, discussants, and administrative colleagues for their dedication to academic mentorship and careful engagement with the presented work. The team also expressed its hope that future editions of the Young Scholars Conference will continue to provide sustained and meaningful support for the academic development of early-career scholars.

Friday, July 25, 2025

Sida Liu on Against Digital Superstition: On the Pseudoscientific Development of the Sociology of Law in China (CLSR)

"Against Digital Superstition: On the Pseudoscientific Development of the Sociology of Law in China"
Sida Liu
China Law and Society Review
Published online: May 2025

Abstract: This article examines the current state of the sociology of law in China, which is characterized by pervasive digital superstition and a “scientific turn” towards quantitative methods. The article traces the historical development of the field, critically assesses the impact of digital technologies on sociolegal research, and scrutinizes the underlying causes of digital superstition, including academic incentives, technological advancements, and state control over data. In response to these issues, the article proposes alternative approaches to conducting sociolegal research in the era of digitalization, such as video observation and online ethnography, highlighting the significance of storytelling. The article advocates for a balanced and reflective approach to digitalization in Chinese sociology of law, emphasizing the potential for meaningful advancements in the field when digital technologies are employed judiciously and responsibly.

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Sida Liu and Gihad Nasr on The City and the North: Canada in the Chicago School of Sociology (The American Sociologist)

"The City and the North: Canada in the Chicago School of Sociology"
Sida Liu, Gihad Nasr
The American Sociologist
Published online: June 2025

Abstract: This article explores the intertwined histories of the Chicago School of sociology and Canadian sociology, challenging the conventional view that the Chicago School’s development was confined to the city of Chicago. By examining the academic journeys of prominent Canadian scholars such as Annie Marion MacLean, Roderick McKenzie, Helen and Everett Hughes, and Erving Goffman, it illustrates how their contributions were instrumental in shaping both the Chicago School and Canadian sociology. This research, based on extensive archival materials from primary and secondary sources, suggests that the continuous mobility and interaction of scholars between Chicago and Canada played an important role in the historical evolution of sociological thought. The study aims to “decenter” the Chicago School by highlighting the significant yet often overlooked contributions of Canadian sociologists, thereby providing a new understanding of its legacy and global impact.

Wednesday, May 21, 2025

Sida Liu and Joonsik Kim on About the Patient Named Taiwan: The Rise of Doctors in Party Politics (Journal of Contemporary Asia)

"About the Patient Named Taiwan: The Rise of Doctors in Party Politics"
Joonsik Kim, Sida Liu
Journal of Contemporary Asia
Published online: April 2025

Abstract: Doctors are not typically known for engaging in party politics. However, in Taiwan, many doctors have assumed prominent roles within the Democratic Progressive Party, including Dr Lai Ching-te who became president in May 2024. This article examines the factors contributing to the rise of doctors in Taiwan’s party politics since democratisation, particularly in the Democratic Progressive Party. Although the existing literature focuses on regime transitions and capital convertibility in elite circulation, this study proposes an alternative explanation: the symbiotic relationship between the Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan and the Democratic Progressive Party. Utilising extensive archival data from Taiwan, the article argues that this alliance, which combined an influential medical association with a weak political party, facilitated the emergence of doctor-politicians during Taiwan’s democratisation. The findings suggest that professional associations can serve as political vehicles, transforming individual efforts into collective action by participating in policymaking and mobilising resources for social movements and electoral politics. Furthermore, the case of doctor-politicians in Taiwan offers valuable insights into professional mobilisation, demonstrating how scientific expertise can be harnessed to wield moral authority and establish political coalitions within and beyond professional boundaries.

Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Sida Liu and Anson Au on Mobility Spaces: Geographical and Professional Distances in Career Mobility (JABS)

"Mobility Spaces: Geographical and Professional Distances in Career Mobility"
Sida Liu and Anson Au
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Published online: December 2024

Abstract: This article introduces the novel concept of “mobility spaces” to investigate the role of geographical and professional distances in career mobility and how they are influenced by social structural factors. Mobility spaces encompass physical, social, and legal spaces that professionals navigate while shaping their career trajectories over time. The study focuses on the movement of professionals across mobility spaces and examining the constraints and opportunities affecting their career paths. Using empirical data on the mobility of Hong Kong law firm partners from 1994 to 2021, the article demonstrates that social structural factors such as gender, race and ethnicity, firm origins, and firm prestige significantly influence the geographical and professional distances that professionals manage to traverse in their career moves. The mobility spaces theory aims to use space to contextualize the interplay between individual and macrostructural factors in shaping professional career outcomes.

Monday, December 9, 2024

New Chinese book by Sida Liu: Letters on Sociology of Law (Peking University Press)

法社會學信札(Letters on Sociology of Law)
劉思達(Sida Liu)
北京大學出版社(Peking University Press)
出版日期 (Publication date):Nov 2024

簡介(Description): 本書採用類似於《波斯人信札》的書信文體,通過一位法科學生與一位社會學教授的書信對話,深入淺出地闡釋法律社會學的發展歷史和經典理論、法律社會學的研究方法、論述法律系統的社會結構與變遷以及一些經典實證研究等,並應用這些理論與方法對中國法律實踐的種種現實問題進行探討,在看似大相徑庭的學術知識之間建立起關聯。

本書不同於一般的學術專著和傳統教材,更像是一個學習法律社會學的路線圖。文后還按信件順序給出了參考文獻,讀者可以按圖索驥汲取更多營養,不必拘泥於某種對理論或者學術傳統的通常解釋。

除了介紹和解讀法社會學,還有一個面向,就是書信體帶來的“符號互動主義”的展現。通過兩個人的對話,使理論的源流、意涵和指向更清晰,同時也展示了年輕學者的一些學術人生中的困惑、掙扎與努力。而且通信的過程,就是不斷建構兩個人之間的關係,這種人與人之間的關係是一直動態變化着的。

Monday, November 25, 2024

Sida Liu et al on Crisis as opportunity: legal career paths at two historical turning points in Hong Kong (LSR)

"Crisis as opportunity: legal career paths at two historical turning points in Hong Kong"
Sida Liu, Anson Au, and Pamela P. Tsui
Law & Society Review, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp. 481 - 504
Published online: October 2024

Abstract: This article investigates the career trajectories of Hong Kong solicitors during two historical turning points, specifically 1994–1997 and 2018–2021, when hundreds of lawyers left private practice to pursue alternative career options such as business and finance, government and politics, or relocation to other countries. Data are sourced from the career mobility records of law firm partners reported in 336 monthly issues of the Hong Kong Lawyer journal between 1994 and 2021, as well as other relevant archival sources. The research examines the underlying forces that led these law firm partners to abandon their high-status positions and pursue alternative career paths during these pivotal moments in Hong Kong’s history. The findings suggest that the career trajectories of these elite professionals are not solely based on individual choices but are also shaped by their social origins and the physical and social spaces that influence their careers over time. This study contributes original insights into the complex interplay between individual, spatial and temporal factors that drive career mobility among legal professionals.

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

Sida Liu et al on China’s Pragmatic Approach to International Human Rights Law (JITCL)

"China’s Pragmatic Approach to International Human Rights Law"
Sida Liu,Yun Xian, Sitao Li
The UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law, Volume 9, Issue 1, 2024
Published online: October 2024

Abstract: China has adopted a pragmatic approach to international human rights law in the early 21st century, characterized by pragmatic experimentation in the appropriation and modification of human rights norms, selective decoupling of international and domestic human rights rules, and divergent enforcement in the legislative and practical responses to various human rights issue areas. This approach permits significant gaps between “law on the books” and “law in action,” as well as between domestic rules and international law. Analysis of China’s engagement with the ICCPR and CEDAW, respectively focused on criminal procedural rights and women’s rights, reveals the complex and uneven nature of China’s human rights governance. While China has gradually reduced overt violations of human rights within criminal procedures, it has concurrently developed a more opaque and institutionalized punitive system. In comparison, despite recent legislative advances, limited practical enforcement and increased state control on feminist activists characterize women’s rights protections in China. Understanding China’s pragmatic approach is crucial for effectively addressing human rights concerns within the country.

Monday, August 26, 2024

Hong Kong Law Journal (Vol. 53, Part 3 of 2023)

HONG KONG LAW JOURNAL
Editor-in-Chief: Professor Rick Glofcheski
Associate Editor: Professor Albert Chen
Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Analysis

Foreign Law in Common Law Courts of Appeal: From Hong Kong to Jersey and Cayman Islands 
The Hon William Gummow AC...907

Articles

The Legal Response to Drugs and Social Supply: The Case of Hong Kong
Karen A Joe-Laidler, Kate Lowe, Simon NM Young and Tin H Cheung...913

A Tribute to the Late Sir Tl Yang (1929–2023)

Trailblazing the Colonial Judiciary: A Tribute to Hong Kong’s First Chinese Chief Justice
Chen Li...941

China Law

An Examination of the Power of the Central People’s Government to Issue Directives to the Chief Executive under the Hong Kong Basic Law
Fan Xiang...967

At the Crossroads? Assessing SEP Injunctive Relief under Patent Law and Competition Law in China
Bo Yuan and Peicheng Wu...995

OECD/G20 Pillar Two and Tax Laws of China: How to Harmonise? 
Xiaojing Cui and Yuan Liu...1027

Empirical Study of the Role of the Chinese Guiding Case System in Chinese Law 
Dong Yan and Jeffery E Thomas...1057

Focus: The Empirical Turn in Chinese Legal Studies

Introduction

Empirical Legal Studies Made in China: An Empirical Study on Legal Doctoral Dissertations
Jinhua Cheng...1085

Quantitative Legal Research Based on China’s Adjudication Documents: The End of the Golden Era?
Ke Li and Yang Feng...1119

Problems and Misunderstandings in Chinese Empirical Legal Research: The Example of Papers Involving Judgment Documents 
Yu Zeyang and Yu Mengyao...1141

Monopoly and Fragmentation: Data Collection in Chinese Empirical Legal Study
Qin Ma...1171

The Application and Limitations of Survey Methods in the Quantitative Assessment of Justice in China
Hongqi Wu and Lin Haibin...1195

Trade-off Between “Big Data” and “Small Data”: a Simulation Study on The Application of Random Sampling in Chinese Empirical Legal Studies
Yiwei Xia...1215

Data Still Needs Theory: Collider Bias in Empirical Legal Research

How to Do Empirical Legal Studies without Numbers? 
Sida Liu and Sitao Li...1259

Book Review

Haochen Sun, Technology and the Public Interest
Tap Huang...1275


Sida Liu and Sitao Li on How to Do Empirical Legal Studies without Numbers? (HKLJ)

"How to Do Empirical Legal Studies without Numbers?"
Sida Liu and Sitao Li
Hong Kong Law Journal, Vol. 53, Part 3 of 2023, pp.1260 - 1273

Abstract: How to do empirical legal studies without numbers? This article addresses this methodological question at a crossroads of empirical legal studies in China. It does not aim to provide a normative defence for the value of qualitative methods. Instead, we demonstrate how a ‘scientific turn’ in the 2010s has made empirical legal research in China almost exclusively about quantitative research and then illustrate how qualitative methods can also benefit from the rise of digital technology. We draw on three recent studies as examples to compare and contrast the methodological challenges and opportunities for doing empirical legal studies without numbers: (1) Ke Li’s book Marriage Unbound as an example of ethnography in combination with archival research; (2) Sitao Li’s article ‘Face-Work in Chinese Routine Criminal Trials’ as an example of trial video observation; and, (3) Di Wang and Sida Liu’s article ‘Performing “Artivism”’ as an example of online ethnography. The discussion shows that, despite the rising popularity of ‘big data’ computational analysis in recent years, quantitative methods are not necessarily more technologically advanced than qualitative ones. Technology-assisted interviews and ethnography can open up many new possibilities in data collection and data analysis, sometimes resulting in more exciting and innovative research.

Please click here to view the full article on SSRN.


Wednesday, July 3, 2024

Saturday, June 29, 2024

Sida Liu et al on Digital Habitus and Age-based Earnings Differentials in Online Legal Services (BJIR)

"Where rookies prevail: Digital habitus and age-based earnings differentials in online legal services"
Sida Liu, Yao Yao
British Journal of Industrial Relations
Published online: June 2024

Abstract: This research investigates how and why the digitalization of work can disrupt age-based earnings stratification in an occupation. Analysing a service archive dataset from a major online legal service platform in China, the study finds that, contrary to the traditional patterns of income inequality, younger lawyers earn more than older lawyers in the digital legal field. Further analyses of the platform's service records and interviews with lawyers working on this platform suggest that the platform's work content and work distribution mechanism make mature lawyers’ human, social and symbolic capital less useful. Meanwhile, the preferences of platform clients place added value on younger lawyers’ digital habitus and turn it into a new form of cultural capital, manifested in their proficiency and effectiveness in digital communication. By examining habitus and capital in the emerging digital legal field, this research deepens the understanding of the impact of digital technologies on knowledge-intensive occupations.

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Sida Liu and Sitao Li on Rights in China: Myths, Abuses, and Politics (Annual Reviews)

"Rights in China: Myths, Abuses, and Politics"
Sida Liu and Sitao Li
Annual Review of Sociology
Published online: May 2024

Abstract: This article presents a sociological perspective on understanding rights in China, examining the interplay between multiple myths of rights, rights abuses, and the politics of rights within various social and physical spaces. It highlights competing myths of rights held by the state, ordinary citizens, rights activists, and legal professionals. The article examines how rights abuses contribute to rights consciousness and mobilization across different human rights domains in a repressive political context. By analyzing the politics of rights in interconnected spaces, such as the street, the legal system, the global arena, and cyberspace, it emphasizes the importance of continuous engagement between domestic and overseas actors in shaping China's human rights future. The article encourages social science researchers to thoroughly examine the myths, abuses, and politics of rights before making normative judgments about China's human rights conditions.


Thursday, August 31, 2023

Sida Liu on Navigating The Career Mobility Landscape Of Law Firm Partners In Hong Kong (Hong Kong Lawyer)

"Navigating The Career Mobility Landscape Of Law Firm Partners In Hong Kong"
Hong Kong Lawyer
Published online: July 2023
Achieving partnership in a law firm is a coveted milestone for lawyers looking to advance their careers. In the past, lateral mobility between firms was uncommon for most partners in large law firms, due to the widely-adopted ‘Cravath System’ of law firm management. This system operated under the assumption that the most talented associates would be promoted to partners, and that most partners would remain with the firm until retirement. However, this assumption is no longer valid in the 21st century. Today, lateral moves of partners between law firms are increasingly common, and some partners also pursue in-house positions or leave the legal profession altogether for other job opportunities.
     Hong Kong Lawyer, the official journal of The Law Society of Hong Kong, provides a valuable resource for understanding how Hong Kong lawyers develop and evolve their professional careers over time. Since 1994, it has published more than 300 monthly updates on partner mobility in Hong Kong law firms. From 1994 to 2021, the journal had reported on over 11,000 partner moves, including internal promotions, lateral moves between firms, and information on those partners who relocated from Hong Kong to other jurisdictions or left law firms to pursue other career options.
     The lateral mobility of law firm partners has undergone notable changes from the 1990s to the 2010s. In the 1990s, partner moves between local firms accounted for the vast majority of lateral mobility. However, from the 2000s onward, particularly after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, there was a significant increase in the flow of partners among UK and US firms. Between 1994 and 2008, UK firms received five partners from US firms and sent ten partners to US firms. In contrast, between 2009 and 2018, UK firms received 29 partners from US firms and sent 43 partners to US firms. Additionally, there were 39 lateral moves between two UK firms and 50 lateral moves between two US firms during this period. In total, 161 partners changed jobs among UK and US firms in 2009-2018, whereas only 12 partners in 1994-2000 and 60 partners in 2001-2008 made similar moves.
      The increased lateral hiring between UK and US firms in the 2010s can be attributed, in part, to the rapid rise of China-related capital market and other deals in the 2000s. This led several Wall Street firms to establish new offices or expand their existing offices in Hong Kong to build stronger Hong Kong law capacity. This, in turn, generated a wave of partner moves from the Magic Circle and other UK or US firms to these elite US firms. In order to replace the lost partners, the Magic Circle firms promoted some senior associates internally, but they also made lateral hires from other UK, US, or Hong Kong firms. These hiring activities formed a cycle of partner moves among elite Anglo-American firms.
     Over the past two decades, lateral mobility between local firms in Hong Kong has declined. In the period between 1994 and 2000, there were 371 partner moves between Hong Kong law firms. This number decreased to 282 in 2001-2008 and then to 212 in 2009-2018. This trend may indicate a divergence of career prospects between lawyers in the ‘two hemispheres’ of the legal profession. While partners in elite corporate law firm enjoyed increased career mobility in the early 21st century, partners in medium-sized and small local firms became less mobile.
     PRC firms have only recently entered the scene of partner mobility in Hong Kong. While hiring associates and forming associations with local firms was common practice for PRC law firms in Hong Kong, they had only recruited a handful of partners from local or foreign firms until the mid-2010s. However, in the late 2010s, the number of PRC law offices in Hong Kong increased substantially, which generated a second wave of lateral mobility in the legal profession. In addition to offering partnership to senior associates in elite UK or US firms, PRC firms also recruited a number of high-profile partners from these firms. This ongoing wave of partner moves from Anglo-American firms to PRC firms is a strong indicator of the shifting landscape of Hong Kong’s legal services market.
     In addition to lateral moves between law firms, some partners chose to pursue alternative careers in Hong Kong or elsewhere. From 1994 to 2021, more than 1,700 law firm partners relocated to other jurisdictions or shifted to other career paths, including over 400 women. While the majority of these partners made internal transfers to other offices overseas or took the familiar in-house path to business corporations and government agencies, some lawyers ventured into exotic careers as writers, chefs, musicians, or art collectors. Furthermore, several partners left the legal profession to pursue careers in politics, especially in the late 1990s when China restored the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong. In the 2010s, by contrast, such political career paths were rarely observed.
      Overall, the career mobility of law firm partners in Hong Kong has undergone significant changes over the past few decades, reflecting the evolving landscape of the city’s legal profession. The competition for talent has intensified over time, as PRC firms compete with established UK, US, and local firms for the best lawyers in the city. To remain competitive, law firms in Hong Kong need to adapt to these changes, by fostering a strong sense of community and loyalty among lawyers and cultivating specialized expertise in emerging areas of practice. Furthermore, there is a need to help local law firms stay competitive with global law firms, given their important role in the city’s legal services market. As Hong Kong continues to navigate its unique position as a global financial centre and China’s gateway to the world, the career mobility of law firm partners will remain a dynamic and closely watched aspect of the city’s legal services market, with implications for the long-term growth and sustainability of law firms in the city.

Thursday, March 30, 2023

New Book by Sida Liu et al: The Asian Law and Society Reader (Cambridge University Press)

The Asian Law and Society Reader
Lynette J. Chua, David M. Engel, and Sida Liu
Cambridge University Press
Published in March 2023
400 pp.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864824
Book Description: The first reader on Asian law and society scholarship, this book features reading selections from a wide range of Asian countries – East, South, Southeast and Central Asia – along with original commentaries by the three editors on the theoretical debates and research methods pertinent to the discipline. Organized by themes and topical areas, the reader enables scholars and students to break out of country-specific silos to make theoretical connections across national borders. It meets a growing demand for law and society materials in institutions and universities in Asia and around the world. It is written at a level accessible to advanced undergraduate students and graduate students as well as experienced researchers, and serves as a valuable teaching tool for courses focused on Asian law and society in law schools, area studies, history, religion, and social science fields such as sociology, anthropology, politics, government, and criminal justice.
Reviews: 

‘This is just the volume that sociolegal scholars have been waiting for! The Asian Law and Society Reader is an elegantly organized, comprehensive, and accessible text, analyzing contemporary substantive topics within enduring legacies of colonialism and rapid legal and social transformation. The text illuminates the significance of this innovative and rich body of research for all law and society scholars today - wherever one works in the world.’

Eve Darian-Smith - Professor and Chair of Global and International Studies, University of California, Irvine, and coeditor of the Routledge Handbook of Law and Society (2021)

‘This book is a treasure trove of law and society research, spanning a massive diversity of societies and an equally broad array of issues. There is no scholar of the region who will fail to learn from it, and it will be of great use for teaching and research.’

Tom Ginsburg - Leo Spitz Professor of International Law, Ludwig and Hilde Wolf Research Scholar, and Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago

‘This intelligently curated collection brings together a new generation of Asian law and society research. It is exactly the right starting point for getting up to speed on the diversity of the field, or for anyone who wants to learn more about Asian politics and society through the lens of law.’

Rachel Stern - Professor of Law and Political Science and Pamela P. Fong and Family Distinguished Chair in China Studies, School of Law, University of California, Berkeley

‘In the twenty-first century, Asia will surely become another center for law and society scholarship. The inherent diversity of Asia will be further developed and conducive to future-oriented institutional experiments and knowledge innovation. From this point of view, the publication of The Asian Law and Society Reader is of great significance. I believe that it is the best introductory guide for Asian law and society research at this stage, and is also an indispensable reference for carrying out law and society education in Asian countries.’

Weidong Ji - University Professor of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and President, China Institute for Socio-Legal Studies

‘This book examines the meaning and action of law in diverse Asian societies through a detailed examination of a wide range of issues. Readers will gain in-depth knowledge of various topics and will be able to read the universal significance of law and society studies in Asia.’

Yoshitaka Wada - Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, Waseda University, Tokyo

‘Grounded in rich empirical research, this volume extends the epistemological and methodological imagination of law and society. Intellectual conversations between empirical essays and insightful commentary reveal intellectual journeys of scholars and the field itself, achieving both a bird’s-eye view of the field and insights into the lives of ordinary people as they negotiate socio-legal realities on the ground.’

Yukiko Koga - Associate Professor of Anthropology, Yale University

Tuesday, January 31, 2023

HKU Law Welcomes Professor Sida Liu, Professor of Sociology of Law

Welcome to Professor Sida Liu who joined the Faculty of Law as a Professor of Law! Professor Sida Liu 劉思達, LLB, Peking University Law School, 2002, PhD, The University of Chicago, 2009, also holds a courtesy appointment in the Department of Sociology. Professor Liu’s research interests include sociology of law, Chinese law and society, criminal justice and human rights, law and globalization, and sociolegal theory. He has conducted extensive empirical research on various aspects of China’s legal reform and legal professions. In addition to his empirical work, Professor Liu also writes on theories of law, professions, and social spaces.

     Professor Liu is the author of three books in Chinese and English, including The Lost Polis: Transformation of the Legal Profession in Contemporary China (Peking University Press, 2008), The Logic of Fragmentation: An Ecological Analysis of the Chinese Legal Services Market (Shanghai Joint Publishing Co., 2011), and Criminal Defense in China: The Politics of Lawyers at Work (with Terence C. Halliday, Cambridge University Press, 2016). He has also published many articles in leading law and social science journals, including Law & Society Review, Law & Social Inquiry, Law & Policy, Asian Journal of Law and Society, Wisconsin Law Review, Fordham Law Review, Yale Journal of International Law, Journal of Legal Education, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, American Journal of Sociology, Sociological Theory, European Journal of Social Theory, China Quarterly, etc. Most recently, Professor Liu has co-edited The Asian Law and Society Reader (with Lynette J. Chua and David M. Engel, Cambridge University Press, 2023).
     Professor Liu holds external courtesy appointments as Faculty Fellow at the American Bar Foundation, Affiliated Scholar of the U.S.-Asia Law Institute at New York University School of Law, Faculty Affiliate of the Center on the Legal Profession at Harvard Law School, and Vice President of the China Institute for Socio-Legal Studies at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. He has served as Chair of the Section on Sociology of Law at the American Sociological Association and Board Member of the Law & Society Association, the Asian Law & Society Association, the Canadian Law & Society Association, and the Consortium of Undergraduate Law and Justice Programs. Before joining the HKU faculty, Professor Liu taught at the University of Toronto and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He received his LLB from Peking University Law School and his PhD in sociology from the University of Chicago. In 2016-2017, he was a Member of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. His research areas include:
  • Sociology of Law
  • Chinese Law and Society
  • Human Rights
  • Law and Globalization