Jedidiah J. Kroncke
Washington Law Review (Vol. 99, No. 4 (2024))
Published online: January 2025
Follow the research activities and scholarship of the Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong
"Bigtechs and the Emergence of New Systemically Important Financial Institutions: Lessons from the Chinese Experience"
Christine M. Wang, Douglas W. Arner
Emory International Law Review (Vol. 39, Iss. 1 (2024))
Published online: December 2024
HKU Legal Scholarship Blog wishes everyone a Happy Chinese New Year 2025.
The Year of the Snake.
Abstract: In light of the critical role of arbitration in resolving international commercial disputes within the rapidly developing and integrating ASEAN economies, this study investigates the interpretation and application of the public policy exception, a major factor in the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, across ASEAN’s diverse legal jurisdictions. It critically assesses how different ASEAN countries, each at varying stages of arbitration development, approach this exception. It highlights the differences in interpretation, with more developed jurisdictions adopting a narrower approach, contrasting with broader interpretations in less developed ones, thus revealing a correlation between a jurisdiction’s level of arbitration development and its approach to the public policy exception. This study also observes a possible trend towards greater coherence and uniformity in recent arbitration reforms across the region. Despite the challenges in harmonizing the public policy exception regionally, it argues for a uniform and narrow interpretation, aligning with international standards to enhance ASEAN’s attractiveness for cross-border business and investment.
Outstanding Researcher Award 2023-24
Thomas Cheng
"Collaborative Protection of Intellectual Property"
Taorui Guan
University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 46 (2024), Issue 2
Published online: January 2025
Abstract: This article examines how Indigenous Peoples who depend on World Heritage sites for their culture and livelihood can appeal to the Committee when State Parties fail to comply with their obligations. While scholars criticize the World Heritage Convention for the lack of participation of Indigenous Peoples, particularly in the inscription and management processes, the framework of the Convention also allows representation and visibility. Indeed, compliance mechanisms offer opportunities for Indigenous advocates to negotiate Land sovereignty and environmental protection. TWAIL, which places the worldview of Indigenous Peoples at the center of legal practice, is crucial to understanding the interactions between Indigenous Peoples and the 1972 UNESCO Convention. TWAILers highlight how international law historically denies sovereignty rights to Indigenous Peoples. Article 6(1) echoes this absence of sovereignty. This article examines three cases in which Indigenous advocates petition to protect Native Lands against environmental degradations and colonization: Kakadu, Wood Buffalo, and Uluru. Ultimately, the challenges of Indigenous activists in their quest to preserve nature and culture reveal that the absence of sovereignty prerogatives remains a substantial issue. While the Convention provides a venue for advocacy and international awareness, Indigenous Peoples still must negotiate Land autonomy and cultural sovereignty with the State.
Congratulations to Michael Ng (吳海傑), whose book Political Censorship in British Hong Kong: Freedom of Expression and the Law (1842–1997) was awarded the honorable mention of the International Society for Chinese Law & History (ISCLH) 2024 Biennial Book Prize. The book was published by the Cambridge University Press in September 2022.
Background on the prize: The International Society for Chinese Law and History (ISCLH) has established a biennial book prize for the monograph that has been published in the previous two years and made a major and unique contribution to improving understanding of Chinese law and history. Eligible monographs shall be based on original research on Chinese law in history, historical works with extensive and substantial legal analysis, or historically grounded legal studies comparing China and another society. For more information on the book prize, click here.
Introduction:
(Click here to read the full article)
ARCHBOLD HONG KONG 2025
Editor-in-Chief: The Hon Mr Justice Bokhary
General Editor: Professor Simon Young
Sweet & Maxwell
October 2024